| Webmaster Forum Rules | Posting Guide | Contact Us | Testimonials | Contributing Geek Program | Advertise on Geek/Talk |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 76
|
I am really leaning towards the school of thought that DMOZ is not relevant anymore (at least no where near as relevant as in the past). Why do I think this?
How many of you actually get all worked up about it? Does DMOZ really directly drive traffic to your sites directly? Indirectly (my Google traffic comes from search engine results)? Sorry to ramble. I'm just curious if I am totally out in left field about this?
__________________
Kent Daily Niche Alert | Richmond SEO Company | Android Tips, Products, and Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. Louis, Missouri USA
Posts: 3,015
|
esoomllub as I was reading this I was thinking that you were typing the exact same things that I would have said about this subject. In fact I was planning on starting a thread related to DMOZ.
Much of what you said is true. Some people might not agree with it or want to agree with it because they hate for things to change or because something is stuck in their heads as being true and they refuse to believe it isn't true. DMOZ was most likely once very important, but so many things have changed now. There are many more directories. There are more big search engines. There are also more sites with links that deliver traffic. Also, while PageRank might be important in the minds of some people, it is not as important as it once was. Forget about DMOZ and forget about PageRank. All a person needs to do is concentrate on making their site the very best they can and as a result everything else with take care of itself. There will be people who will link to you just because they like the site and those links can bring you extra traffic. If you have made your site with people in mind and are doing the best possible the SEO that happens as natural result will help you. Search engines are extremely important and ranking high in the search engine results pages is what really matters. Being in DMOZ isn't going to make you and not being in it certainly isn't going to destroy you. However, being listed at or near the top in the search engine results can really help. You might notice that a great many of the very large leading sites are NOT listed in DMOZ. But this didn't keep them from having good positions in the search engine results pages. Too many people keep repeating old information. Sometimes this old information is just no longer true but if people keep hearing it they will believe it is true. As a result there are people who think DMOZ is the ultimate prize and that a high PageRank is also an ultimate prize. Neither is true. I ramble a bit at times as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 293
|
You guys talk as if dmoz is dead and its not worth the 15 seconds it takes to submit there. Sure it may not be as great as it once was, but it is still better then the vast majority of directories out there, especially the paid ones that people have no problem submiting to.
So to say that its useless is incorrect, it may not be as valuable as it once was, but it still has value (just like any link does) so why not take the few seconds and submit a site? On a side note, I had a site that only had a link from dmoz(and google and whatever other sites pull their content) and just that one link got the site a PR6. I then sold that site for nearly a thousand dollars (and the only value was the PR and dmoz link) so as far as Im concerned, it is a rather amazing directory, cuz it makes me money. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. Louis, Missouri USA
Posts: 3,015
|
I am not saying it is useless. I'm only saying it is not as important as it once was.
I'm also saying that DMOZ is no guarantee of fantastic miracles happening just because one gets into it. Also, it isn't the end of the world if a person doesn't get in. If a person wants to apply there is nothing wrong with that. They may or may not make it in for any of a number of reasons. I am saying it isn't the end of the world if they don't make it in and they shouldn't spend any time being worried about it. They should just rely on other sources and using other methods and sources they can do just fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 293
|
Quote:
What I disagree with is people dumping on dmoz because its not 'as great as it once was'. The fact that we have threads talking about it and the fact I posted in this thread is ludicrous Its a directory, it has value, submit, forget and move on to the next directory. But I guess a good gossip story about a once mighty directory is fun for some.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 76
|
I did not mean to imply it was useless either. I brought up the subject here because I wanted to get opinions from other people trying to make a living from the internet. If you were to bring this up on resource-zone, you seem to get bashed by the armies of DMOZ (somewhat sarcastically stated). I go to DMOZ maybe once a quarter now, as opposed to visiting it nearly daily before Google became such the gorilla of search.
If you take a walk over to resource-zone, you can see how many (many) (many) people do fret over it. I used to be at least on the fringe of that camp. And I agree, it is worth the 15 seconds to stop over and submit your site (it is a small amount of time now since they upgraded servers last year -- when the submit functionality would only work once in a while). It's just not even near the top of my priority list anymore, and I am curious how others view it. Any thoughts on why Google does not include directory links in search results anymore? I can't even remember when they stopped. It just strikes me as odd that they now relegate "directory" to 2nd page status. Revenues I'd guess, but I think that adsense revenues would be reasonable if they included adsense in their directory (they don't from what I can see)
__________________
Kent Daily Niche Alert | Richmond SEO Company | Android Tips, Products, and Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Posts: 5,223
|
Great points by all.
![]() 1. Plenty of folks still use the rdf data dump which is FREE and or a portion of same. If carefully chosen and spidered for broken links/sites it's a marvelous way to "seed" a directory or even create a subset with a very narrow focus. Unfortunetly, the willfull and reprehensible disregard for the very specific ODP licensing agreament and requirements is rampant. Some of these folks tell long winded stories about the numerous hours it took them to create these listing when in fact many scripts permit you to do it with just a few clicks. For further details on compliance please see: http://dmoz.org/become_an_editor/ http://dmoz.org/license.html http://rdf.dmoz.org/ 2. I'm not sure weather any other folks have actually run a Directory which accepts human submissions but it's darn hard work and you spend a significant amount of time fighting Spam and editing copy which is non compliant and better suited to ebay. Perhaps it's best to remind yourself that your listing is FREE and all of the Editors/Meta folks are volunteers with no compensation. Like Rivux said so well, submit and forget. Follow the guidelines before you submit.HTH
Last edited by Steve_S; 03-25-2005 at 10:47 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Dmoz directory | Kurbin | Marketing Your Website Online | 1 | 07-11-2000 09:38 PM |
| Free Script for DMOZ on your site | Steve_S | Web Design and Webmaster Issues | 5 | 04-15-2000 06:27 AM |
| Dmoz Application Approved | Monkey | Web Design and Webmaster Issues | 15 | 12-27-1999 01:59 PM |
| How to add the dmoz directory to a site? | Max | Web Design and Webmaster Issues | 12 | 11-24-1999 11:10 PM |
| What's the point in DMOZ? | Questy | Marketing Your Website Online | 14 | 11-17-1999 06:13 PM |
![]()