Webmaster Forum Rules | Posting Guide | Contact Us | Testimonials | Contributing Geek Program | Advertise on Geek/Talk
Welcome to the GeekTalk Webmaster Discussion Forums from GeekVillage.com

Click Here To Register. It's Free!

Go Back   geek/talk: Signature-free discourse for serious web publishers > YOUR REVENUE: Making Money On The Internet > Making Money from Online Audio, Video and Web 2.0 Applications
User Name
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-15-2008, 03:20 AM   #1

Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 9,506
Default Video sharing sites given a welcome reprieve via the US Courts

A quite astounding court ruling in a case between an adult video producer and popular video sharing site Veoh Networks (which, incidentally, no longer supports adult content) seems to have paved the way for all video sharing sites to breathe a collective sigh of relief.

Veoh was granted a ruling that effectively put the onus on copyright holders to notify the site of suspected breaches, rather than expecting Veoh staff to manually monitor the site's content to guard against the distribution of copyrighted material. This comes in the wake of several lawsuits against YouTube which, as anyone who has used the service will no doubt agree, is absolutely littered with unlicensed copyrighted content. This ruling seems to offer YouTube a strong layer of protection against future lawsuits, as long as they remove offending material after being notified by copyright holders.

It seems to give YouTube and other video aggregation sites the ability to plead ignorance if challenged over their content and to leave copyrighted material available until such time as they do receive a complaint (which could be indefinitely if the copyright holder is unable to track down their material in every corner of the web).

For more on this, see the following article:

What do you think of this ruling? Do you agree that video sharing sites should be given the benefit of the doubt, while profiting from unlicensed copyrighted material, or should they be assigned some level of responsibility in actively filtering submissions to ensure that clips from popular movies and TV series don't find their way on to the sites, unless the producers of those programs are provided with a royalty kick-back?

Follow Geek/Talk's Twitter Feed and Facebook Page to stay up to date with new discussion threads and online ad industry highlights.

Important GeekVillage Links: Home | Rules | Posting Guide | Report Trouble | Feedback | Advertise on GV
Czar is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Webmaster Network with 18 webmaster related sites for sale fonzerelli_79 Website For Sale - Purchase - Barter - Trade 13 12-16-2003 08:11 PM
Liquidating Established Sites With Custom Software LaNMaN Website For Sale - Purchase - Barter - Trade 2 12-30-2002 08:47 AM
Opinions on a subscription service for sites Zeras Making Money with CPC and/or CPM Programs 0 05-15-2002 03:13 PM
ISSUE: PG Banners on Porn Sites. KP of Snooply Making Money with CPC and/or CPM Programs 2 04-08-2001 10:23 AM
Selling Sites petezippy Making Money with CPC and/or CPM Programs 3 12-14-1999 11:32 AM

Please support our advertisers. They ensure our survival.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 PM.

GeekVillage.com is copyright © 1998-2015 Curiosity Cave - Science gifts for clever kids. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.