Webmaster Forum Rules | Posting Guide | Contact Us | Testimonials | Contributing Geek Program | Advertise on Geek/Talk
Welcome to the GeekTalk Webmaster Discussion Forums from GeekVillage.com

Click Here To Register. It's Free!

Go Back   geek/talk: Signature-free discourse for serious web publishers > YOUR CREATION: Building & Maintaining A Web Site > Web Design and Webmaster Issues
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2002, 09:30 PM   #1
jkcity
Registered User
 
jkcity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 427
Default New kids only domain on the horizon kids.us tld

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2002Dec4.html

I just don't know wether it will work, I just can't see enough people wanting to take them up with all the restrictions imposed.
jkcity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2002, 10:24 PM   #2
Steve_S
I am a Contributing Geek. Are You?
 
Steve_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Posts: 5,224
Default

Much thanks for the post

Yea, this restriction is going to be tough:

"The act says that Web site with a kids.us address cannot post hyperlinks to locations outside of the kids.us domain. It also prohibits chat and instant messaging features, except in cases where a site operator can guarantee the features adhere to kid-friendly standards developed for the domain."

I like the idea as parents of "kids" should have and certainly need more guidence in where their offsprings surf

Point your browser to:

w w w . geekvillage.kids.us
Steve_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2002, 10:50 PM   #3
jkcity
Registered User
 
jkcity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 427
Default

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:H.R.3833:

that is a link for more information on the act, although the actual act that was passed does not appear to be online yet, so we can't see a list of full restrictions that will apply to the domain tld.

note: this may be the actual thing that was passed but I don't know alot about american goverment sites

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...:H.R.3833.ENR:

from the link above

" `(5) SUITABLE FOR MINORS- The term `suitable for minors' means, with respect to material, that it--

`(A) is not psychologically or intellectually inappropriate for minors; and

`(B) serves--

`(i) the educational, informational, intellectual, or cognitive needs of minors; or

`(ii) the social, emotional, or entertainment needs of minors.'."

I wonder how they decide what fits in within these boudries as it will be different for every parent and child.

Last edited by jkcity; 12-05-2002 at 10:54 PM.
jkcity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2002, 01:20 AM   #4
Czar

Webmaster
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 9,506
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jkcity
I wonder how they decide what fits in within these boudries as it will be different for every parent and child.
True, but usage habits will vary according to the differing parent-child relationships that exist.

For example, many parents will likely feel that this effort, however noble (albeit commercial), imposes too many restrictions on a child's viewing spectrum by effectively blocking them not only from .edu and .gov domains, but from countless millions of online documents, cognitive activities, games and the like that are entirely safe for minors. In which case, a parent might decide that NetNanny or similar, in conjunction with COPPA and supervised or semi-supervised use is more than enough control.

As a slight aside, keep in mind that several groups have been pushing for a .kids gTLdomain for the best part of a decade now, but ICANN and others never found the varying proposals feasible. This latest effort will only succeed if enough publishers are attracted to what is essentially a sub-domain space, and are sincere in their efforts to self-regulate their adherance to these guidelines.

It will be interesting to see how the new space is received, and whether the various content filtering software plays will choose to respond competitively, or will instead attempt to strike up a relationship with NeuStar to assist in the screening of .kids.us content.
__________________
Czar

Follow Geek/Talk's Twitter Feed and Facebook Page to stay up to date with new discussion threads and online ad industry highlights.

Important GeekVillage Links: Home | Rules | Posting Guide | Report Trouble | Feedback | Advertise on GV
Czar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I was prosecuted due to domain!! Please help me to make decision CYBERWORLD Web Design and Webmaster Issues 28 06-23-2007 09:18 PM
Somewhat Urgent Domain Name Legal Question austincassidy Business Principles 13 01-21-2002 12:48 PM
register.com domain renewals Aaron Dragushan Making Money with CPC and/or CPM Programs 0 01-15-2001 04:06 PM
Trademark owners trump Domain owners adland Web Design and Webmaster Issues 8 05-20-2000 12:28 AM

Please support our advertisers. They ensure our survival.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 AM.


GeekVillage.com is copyright © 1998-2015 Curiosity Cave - Science gifts for clever kids. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.