View Single Post
Old 12-09-2002, 01:02 PM   #50
JAL
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1
Default

I actually read the complaint and did a little research.. A few facts are interesting:

1) The plaintiff bringing the suit just happend to be an actual attorney employed by the firm that is bring suit on his behalf.

2) The complaint acknowledges that it would be impossible to actually find all the citizend who have "suffered" and as a result the plaintiff/firm will generously accept the potential award on behalf of the class

3) The attorney/plaintiff previously sued his employer b/c theywould not pay for a damaged tooth he incurred while eating candy during work hours.

Regardless of the merits of the case, it looks lke a money grab, pure and simple.
JAL is offline   Reply With Quote